Archive: Author: The Management

We are pleased to announce the preliminary schedule for all the plenary sessions for this year's Personal Democracy Forum. You can see the schedule at a glance here (Day One June 6, Day Two June 7); here's a more detailed overview of what we'll be focusing on: The theme of this year's event is "Agents of Change." We're aiming to move the focus away from technology itself to what people do with these new tools; how key actors like organizers, political leaders, volunteers, and followers interact; and how these players are learning from and adapting to the new environment they are themselves helping create and shape. On Monday June 6, we'll start by hearing from three leading voices who are changing the...

As Nancy Scola noted here yesterday, Obama campaign manager Jim Messina may be an unlikely video star, whose David Plouffe-like "strategy update" to the campaign's base has been getting almost as many views as one from the President announcing his re-election bid. But an email today from Obama to his list titled "Big things" seemed oddly disconnected from the obvious passions firing up his core base at the moment. The email is a straight-out fundraising appeal that starts out: If it were easy to do the big, meaningful things we believe will make our country better -- if it were quick -- someone would have done those things long before any of us showed up. We've chosen to do something hard. You know...

Now that President Obama, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty have all declared their intentions to run for President in 2012 and rolled out their initial campaign websites, and another leading contender, Sarah Palin, has also unveiled a revamped website for her political operation, SarahPac, it's possible to begin sketching the contours of the 2012 election online. And so far, the inside-the-beltway political media is missing the big story. It's not Facebook. It's the data, stupid. Unlike in 2008, when reporters had to be led by the nose to cover the Internet's emergence as the central battlefield of the campaign, this time around no one needs any convincing. Neither do the campaigns. Compared to past elections,...

Calling all tech-politics activists and entrepreneurs: Google and Personal Democracy Forum are teaming up to offer registration fellowships that cover the full forum registration costs and a meal with Googlers for ten well-qualified, creative political entrepreneurs to attend this year's conference on June 6-7 at New York University in New York City. We're looking for innovative people who are trying to tackle big, meangingful problems. Are you trying to change government? Shaking up the non-profit world with a promising new start-up? Blazing new trails in online politics? The Google PdF Fellowship could be yours. To apply, take a few minutes to fill out this form. The deadline for applications is 12 noon EST on April 29, 2011. Winners will be notified by May...

Back in February, about 200 people gathered at Microsoft's Silicon Valley campus for an unusual gathering of non-profit leaders, funders, corporate donors, social media experts, capacity-building organizations and other social change technologists. The TechSoup Global Contributors' Summit was different from your typical conference; rather than feed people's brains with amazing speakers, its goal was to gather amazing people with already well-fed brains to galvanize real collaboration. The idea, in the word's TechSoup Global founder and co-CEO Daniel Ben-Horin, was to pull together leading representatives of the four kinds of groups that TechSoup works with--"networks of organizations that need technology support, networks of corporations that are willing to donate their products, networks of funders interested in building the capacity of civil...

Too often, the discussion of technology and politics employs a kind of lazy shorthand. We say things like "The Internet is revolutionizing politics," or "the Internet is helping dictators," as if a set of network protocols and bits and wires could do anything on its own. Unfortunately, that shorthand often infects our discussion of current events, and we end up debating things like "Twitter Revolution" or "Facebook effect" rather than the real issues, which are what people do with these tools; how key actors like organizers, leaders, volunteers and followers interact; and how these players are learning from and adapting to the new environment they are themselves helping create and shape. The Internet, after all, doesn't empower anyone. We empower...

On Monday, I blogged about Twitter's new "Who to Follow" feature, and urged the company to update its list of suggested accounts to follow under "Politics." And lo and behold, they've done it. But, as you'll see, important questions still remain unanswered about how the list is constructed and what it is supposed to tell us. Gone from the top 25 are clunkers like @CarlyforCA (Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, who had tweeted since last November--she went from #1 to #47, oddly), @RasmussenPoll (Republican pollster Scott Rasmussen--he's now #56 after being #2), @MicheleMalkin (the ultra-right blogger, who went from #5 to #48), and @HouseFloor, an autotweeter that reports every time Congress votes or comes to order, is gone entirely. @JohnBoehner, the House...

Today, Twitter announced a new search feature designed to help users find accounts worth following, based on your personal interests. The tool is supposed to show you suggested users when you search on any term, but I couldn't get that to work (I guess this is a really new feature). It also will show you suggested people to follow on a "who to follow" tab, which you can access from your Twitter home page, as you can see below. Unfortunately, Twitter's list of accounts to follow under "politics" isn't all that new or interesting. First of all, it's the same list of people you will find if you are already using the Twitter mobile client and have stumbled onto the bottom...

Over in Germany, it appears that the traditional political press that covers the government is all a ...

The rumor, reported by the New York Times, that Robert Gibbs is in negotiations to join Facebook in a "senior role" to help "manage the company's communications," leads me to this thought: Who better to manage communications for a global company that rarely answers a direct question about its management than the former spokesman for a White House that rarely answered a direct question about its management? One wishes Facebook wasn't so interested in such a conventional choice...